The ‘Polyxena’ Sarcophagus: A Revision
Presenters
Clemente Marconi, New York University; and Peter A. Thompson, New York University
Abstract
Since its discovery in 1994,
a generation of scholarly literature on the Polyxena Sarcophagus from Gümüsçay
has generated a striking diversity of interpretations regarding this remarkable
monument, all with significant bearing upon crucial questions of the date of
its creation, key details and explanations of its astonishing iconography, and
the original social context of its commission, creation, and use. The range of
speculation has led to a fractured and disparate spread of opinions, including
a number of contradictory and unreliable claims that have yet to be
sufficiently scrutinized, necessitating the comprehensive assessment of its
imagery and significance that is provided in this paper.
We establish the high dating
of the sarcophagus in the Late Archaic period, during the final decade of the
sixth century, contrary to the mid fifth-century date that has recently been
asserted by some scholars, and we characterize its makers as a group of
itinerant sculptors of regional prominence rather than an unspecified and
unevidenced local workshop that has been suggested by other authors. In order
to clarify and resolve questions of iconography that have continued to yield
the most disagreement and confusion in previous studies, drawing upon a new
direct autopsy of the monument, artistic comparanda from western Anatolia, and
archaic texts, we provide a close analysis of the individual figures carved on
the sarcophagus, supporting a new iconographic discussion of the four relief
scenes and providing a new solution to the hitherto problematic understanding
of the relationships between the sculptural program and the identity and status
of the deceased. Our revisions elucidate the history of this monument’s
production and its social functions as one of the richest funerary monuments of
late archaic Anatolia, a cultural landscape ripe with local competition and a
fluorescence of artistic actualizations of wealth and authority.
AIA-5I