Hiding in Plain Sight: Exploring Apotropaic Agency in the Gorgon Graffiti of Pompeii (20 min)
Presenters
Abigail Staub, University of Michigan
Abstract
Roman figural graffiti, with
their characteristic roughness, have historically been treated as inferior in
didactic value both to textual graffiti and to formal figural representations.
The resulting systemic underrecording has led to widespread loss; the first
comprehensive catalogue of Roman figural graffiti was only published in 2001.
However, within the past decade, scholars like Rebecca Benefiel have drawn
critical attention to the sociocultural value of Roman graffiti studies
broadly. Benefiel suggests that graffitified surfaces, typically found in
well-frequented spaces, exert influence on passersby, enticing them to approach
and contribute. Increased engagements strengthen a surface’s visibility and
allure, creating a generative dialogue. Applying Benefiel’s framework, and
building on Margaret Laird’s 2021 study of women in graffiti, I argue that the
gorgon graffiti of Pompeii were exceptionally efficacious apotropaia not in
spite of, but because of their presence within a persuasive graffitified
topography.
This analysis considers all
recorded graffiti images of gorgons at Pompeii within their spatial contexts,
both standalone heads and those within Minerva’s aegis. The latter are
typically not considered apotropaic in their own right, but I argue that the camouflaging
nature of the aegis heightened their potency. Two gorgons appear in the Large
Palaestra, another in the Stabian Baths (alongside four, now lost, gorgons),
and the last in the atrium of the House of the Centenary (IX.8.6). As embedded
graffiti, they could catch potentially malevolent voyeurs unaware, encouraging
them to approach only to repulse and infect them. Such apotropaic graffiti also
allowed a maker, regardless of literacy, to exert immediate psychological
control over their experience of space and imbue vulnerable loci with
protection.
In this paper, I
reconceptualize apotropaic figural graffiti not as inert etchings but as active
agents that provoked tangible action and consequences in a multisensory
environment. By examining the images in situ, we can return critical value to
the category of figural graffiti.
AIA-2D